as medical practitioners in Spain to be "vocation".
And by unsuspected side.
Re: "NAK hiding?" - Augsburg bitter and polemical
From: Michael Grosshans
Date: 08/12/2010
The exact facts on this subject I am still not clear why I am no comment. But I know the author of this letter for over 20 years. From his lines speak bitterness against disappointment, but also strong antipathy of a church that he belonged for decades, and at times even had the function of the conductor. I think the article for emotionally very strong, written with a lot of "Over the Edge" and it seems to me as he left the ground of objectivity, a defiant response. Whether the aforementioned officers of the NAC is guilty or not, other instances have to be clarified. Here is a public prejudice made what the author has no rights. And that concerns the Church as the suspect. This is pure Demagoismus. He is free to make their comments as soon as a verdict is on, but not before. I welcome a clarification of the facts, but reject any form from the polemic. You too, my dear Heinz should hold no attack unless the court has handed down the rule of law an enforceable Judgement. You far exceed that which allows the personal freedom of expression.
0 comments:
Post a Comment